Comments on: Interpretation of Proposed Option-3 for Revised Pension – How far it is an alternative to Option 1 recommended by 7th CPC? https://cgstaffnews.in/interpretation-of-proposed-option-3-for-revised-pension-how-far-it-is-an-alternative-to-option-1-recommended-by-7th-cpc/ Gazetted Holiday List ✓ Restricted Holiday List ✓ School Holiday List ✓ Election Holidy List ✓ Court Holiday List Thu, 04 Jul 2019 04:37:30 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Prabhakaran Nair https://cgstaffnews.in/interpretation-of-proposed-option-3-for-revised-pension-how-far-it-is-an-alternative-to-option-1-recommended-by-7th-cpc/#comment-13869 Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:06:33 +0000 http://www.cgstaffnews.in/?p=8051#comment-13869 Sir, My pre 6CPC revised basic payon retirement with 2 increments was Rs 7900/-PM in the scale of 7450-225-11500. Para 4(2) of Ministry of Pension OM No 38/37/08/P&PW(A) dt 1-9-2008(6CPC imple orders) stipulates that the revuised pension in r/o pre 2006 CG Pensioners, in no case, shall be lower than 50% of the sum of the minimum in the PB and gde pay thereon corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale from which the pensioner had retired. I was sanctioned a pension of Rs 9230/-PM calculating thus =( 7450×1.86+gde pay 4600 =18460 divided by 2 = 9230).But according to fitment table issued by M of Fin on 30-8-2008 the PB+ Gde pay corresponding to the pre-revised basic pay of 7900 is arrived at as 7900×1.86+gde pay 4600 =19300 divided by 2 = 9650. Am I not entitled to pension @ 9650/- ? Pl clarify. C.PRABHAKARAN, EX AAO Def A/Cs.

]]> By: MP Sharma https://cgstaffnews.in/interpretation-of-proposed-option-3-for-revised-pension-how-far-it-is-an-alternative-to-option-1-recommended-by-7th-cpc/#comment-12512 Thu, 25 May 2017 11:20:59 +0000 http://www.cgstaffnews.in/?p=8051#comment-12512 Modified parity is ihitting hard to all employees specially to those who retired from one grade without acp and promotion except stagnation increment after two years like a punishment. I am one of those.i was retired in the yr 2000 as jwm in the scale of 7450-11500.my pension was fixed on 10 months average pay of 12705. The pension was fixed at rs 13226 wef 1.1.2006.which was revised to 33991 wef 1.1.16.my pension works out to 34000 as per modified parity given benefit of rs 9. Is it parity or disparity. Those Persons who were either junior or senior to me are getting nice boost up
I is requested that matter should taken up through court for acceptance of first option alonwith modified parity. in case weightage is given for increment earned as per 5th cpc.

]]> By: A P Verma https://cgstaffnews.in/interpretation-of-proposed-option-3-for-revised-pension-how-far-it-is-an-alternative-to-option-1-recommended-by-7th-cpc/#comment-12378 Sat, 06 May 2017 16:32:33 +0000 http://www.cgstaffnews.in/?p=8051#comment-12378 In reply to A P Verma.

For pre 2016 pensioners
Thanks

]]> By: A P Verma https://cgstaffnews.in/interpretation-of-proposed-option-3-for-revised-pension-how-far-it-is-an-alternative-to-option-1-recommended-by-7th-cpc/#comment-12377 Sat, 06 May 2017 16:07:38 +0000 http://www.cgstaffnews.in/?p=8051#comment-12377 In reply to A P Verma.

Ok pl consider and let me know the methodology
Thanks

]]> By: A P Verma https://cgstaffnews.in/interpretation-of-proposed-option-3-for-revised-pension-how-far-it-is-an-alternative-to-option-1-recommended-by-7th-cpc/#comment-12376 Sat, 06 May 2017 16:00:39 +0000 http://www.cgstaffnews.in/?p=8051#comment-12376 How to arrive at notional pay in option 3 approved by cabinet for 7 th CPC based on data contained in PPO?

]]>