The Minister of State for Health and Family Welfare told in Lok Sabha on 26.7.2019 regarding the pay of Nurses and recommendations of the committee.

“Hon’ble Supreme Court vide judgement dated 29th January, 2016 in Writ Petition (C) No.527/2011 directed Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to look into the grievances of nurses working in private hospitals/ institutions by forming a committee.

Accordingly, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare constituted a committee in February, 2016. The Recommendations of the committee relating to salary and working conditions of nurses working in private hospitals / institutions have been sent to all States/UTs for making legislation/guidelines in this regard.

A number of State Governments have already initiated action in the above matter. Health being State subject, it is for the concerned State Governments to make legislation / guidelines for the purpose”.Similar Posts:

• Revision of rates of Nursing Allowance to the Nursing Personnel
• Declaration of Deliveries by Caesarian Section vis-à-vis normal deliveries at Private Hospitals empanelled under CGHS
• Medical Facilities for Government Employees
• Oxygen Charges for treatment at private hospitals under CGHS
• Demand for pay scales review by All India Nursing Association

ORDER (ORAL)

Justice L. Narasimha Reddy:-

This OA is filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to revise the pre-revised scale of pay of the applicants to the one Rs.7500 to 12000 instead of Rs.7450 to 11500 w.e.f. 01.01.2006. They seek further direction to upgrade the post held by them to the one of Accounts Officer/Audit Officer in the scale of Rs.5400 in PB-2 instead of Rs.4800/- and for further revision of pay scales.

Click to Download Copy of Judgment

Similar Posts:

• Important Cat Judgement regarding MACP
• Judgement on MACP – CAT, Madras Bench, Chennai
• 7th CPC Pension Benefit – Retired on 31.12.2015 – Important Judgement OA. 571/2017
• PIL seeks review of OROP scheme
• CPSE – 3rd Pay Revision: Increment, Bunching of Pay, Dearness Allowance in Revised Pay Structure

BOMBAY High Court Judgment dated 15-10-2018 on MACPs
ORDER

(a) The impugned judgment and order dated 16th April, 2013 made by the CAT is hereby set aside.

(b) The petitioner is held entitled to receive the benefit of MACP with effect from 1st January, 2006 together with all consequential benefits.

(c) The respondents are directed to work out the benefits of MACP with effect from 1st January, 2006 together with consequential benefits and to pay the same to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of three months from today.

d) If, such benefits/consequential benefits are not paid to the petitioner within three months from today, then the respondents will liable to pay interest thereon @ 6% p.a. from the date such payments became due and payable, till the date of actual payment.

(e) Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. There shall however be no order as to costs.

( M. S. SONAK, J. )
( A. S. OKA, J. )

Click to View Judgment Copy

Similar Posts:

• Bombay High Court Judgement On MACP
• MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY – JUDGEMENT OF DELHI HIGH COURT WP (C) 3608-2014
• Important Cat Judgement regarding MACP
• Judgement on MACP – CAT, Madras Bench, Chennai
• Important Supreme Court Judgment

(a) The impugned judgement and order dated 16th April, 2013 made by the CAT is hereby set aside.

(b) The petitioner is held entitled to receive the benefit of MACP with effect from 1st January, 2006 together with all consequential benefits.

(c) The respondents are directed to work out the benefits of MACP with effect from 1st January, 2006 together with consequential benefits and to pay the same to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of three months from today.

(d) If, such benefits/consequential benefits are not paid to the petitioner within three months from today, then the respondents will liable to pay interest thereon @ 6% p.a. from the date such payments became due and payable, till the date of actual payment.

(e) Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. There shall however be no order as to costs.

( M. S. SONAK, J. ) ( A. S. OKA, J. )

Read / Download Bombay High Court Judgement dated 15-10-2018 on MACP

Source: AIRF

Similar Posts:

• Bombay High Court Judgement dt. 15.10.18 on MACP
• Important Cat Judgement regarding MACP
• Judgement on MACP – CAT, Madras Bench, Chennai
• Delhi HC Judgement on MACP
• MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY – JUDGEMENT OF DELHI HIGH COURT WP (C) 3608-2014